Where Pipedrive falls short with a large sales team, a 5-signal test, and 3 exits. Real-world case study of Total Renting, with more than 70 sales reps.
Does Pipedrive work for a large sales team? It works for storing leads and viewing the pipeline, even with dozens of sales reps. At Total Renting, with over 70 sales reps, where it fell short was in the day-to-day: each rep decided who to call, and managers ended up policing movements instead of coaching. In addition, reaching each lead required multiple clicks and screens, using Pipedrive alongside an external calling platform. With 70 reps, you don't fix that by upgrading your plan; you fix it by changing who decides the work order.

Updated: October 2026 · Written by Alex Sánchez, co-founder of Vixiees, who works daily with sales teams handling high lead volumes.
Lorenzo Bertolini, Commercial Director at Total Renting—a vehicle leasing broker with over 70 sales reps—sums it up in one sentence from the interview he gave us: "I thought Pipedrive was enough, until I saw how Avanti was managing leads." Avanti Renting is a new brand within the same group, and that is where he saw a team managing leads "way faster."
This article isn't about whether Pipedrive is a bad CRM. It's a good CRM, and their team used it for years. Vixiees sells the tool being compared here, so the case data is noted as self-reported by the client. It is about what changes when the team grows, how to know if it has already happened to you, and what options you have: configure it better, layer something on top, or switch.
Does Pipedrive work for a large sales team?
Yes, for what a CRM does: logging contacts and deals, moving them through stages, automating notifications, and pulling reports. Pipedrive doesn't publish a user cap on its limits page.
In our experience, the problem appears elsewhere. A pipeline CRM is designed so that each sales rep manages their own portfolio: they log in, look at their deals or their activity list, and decide what to do. With a few reps, the director can see what's happening. With seventy, everyone works their own way and no one can verify it without spending the entire day reviewing.
Diego Juárez, who manages projects at Total Renting and used Pipedrive for years ("I love Pipedrive," he says in the interview), explains it like this: in a regular CRM, the rep has an activity list on another screen "where they call according to, really, whatever they feel like doing."
Pipedrive plan limits that affect a large team
Before discussing day-to-day operations, it's best to rule out technical constraints. These are the per-account limits published by Pipedrive on their usage limits page (updated September 3, 2026), for current plans:
Limit | Lite | Growth | Premium | Ultimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Leads and deals | 2,500 per seat | 5,000 per seat | 15,000 per seat | 20,000 per seat |
Automations | Not included | 50 | 150 | 250 |
Teams | Not included | Not included | 15 | 25 |
Visibility groups | Not included | Not included | 15 | 25 |
Custom fields | 30 | 100 | 300 | 500 |
Across all plans, there is an absolute maximum of 300,000 leads and deals per company. Prices range from 14 to 79 euros per seat per month with annual billing, according to the Pipedrive pricing page in October 2026; with 70 sales reps on Premium, that's about 4,100 euros per month. We break this down in how much Pipedrive costs.
Watch out for the cap: with 70 seats, the 300,000 leads and deals per company equals about 4,300 per seat, which is less than what Premium promises per seat. If your team handles high volume, check how many deals you have before ruling out limits: according to the same page, open, won, and lost deals count unless they are archived or deleted. If your problem were purely about caps, archiving and upgrading your plan could resolve it up to that limit. At Total Renting, based on their interviews, the issue they describe stems from work methodology, not caps.
Where you really notice it: the day-to-day of 70 sales reps
These are the five areas where Total Renting noticed the model fell short. None of them are flaws in Pipedrive as software; they are consequences of working from a pipeline and a list when the team is large.
1. Each rep decides who to call
They had a sales protocol, but "they didn't have a path to guide them within the CRM," according to Lorenzo. Each rep chose whether to call a new lead first, one with an active quote, or run a follow-up. With seventy people, that means seventy different criteria for which lead is urgent.
2. Reaching each lead takes too many steps
Lorenzo describes a rep's process for every call: go back in the screen, search for the lead by stage, open the record, review history, place the call from an external calling platform, and return to the browser to write notes. Result: 50 leads took a rep between 4 and 5 hours. That's time spent searching and navigating, not talking to clients.
3. Managers act like police
Total Renting has 7 managers for over 70 sales reps. Previously, their days were spent reviewing lead movements, merges, deletions, and duplicates. Lorenzo defines it as "process control instead of quality control over the sales reps," and remembers that on Mondays he walked in thinking about "the next trick the reps would use to grab more leads" and take them from their peers. If you're experiencing something similar, we explain it in what to do with duplicate leads among sales reps.
4. Leads left in limbo
When a rep forgets to schedule the next activity, the lead sits in its stage untouched. Diego describes it like this: "Forgotten leads, leads with no activity, lost in that limbo where eventually no one ever contacts them again. That's lost money."
5. Training a new rep takes time
In a pipeline CRM, a new rep has to learn every stage, which fields to complete, and how often to call a lead. Then, as Diego says, "each person's intuition kicks in and they do whatever they want." The more reps onboarded each year, the bigger this burden becomes.
CRM Scale Test: 5 signs your team has outgrown the model
We've turned these five points into a quick test. The thresholds are our own indicative guidelines, not an industry standard. Answer yes or no based on data from the past week:
Does each rep decide their own call order? If the sequence isn't driven by business logic, the answer is yes.
Does a rep take more than 4 minutes on average to move from one lead to the next? Count searching, opening the record, calling, and note-taking. For context, 50 leads in 4-5 hours is about 5 minutes per lead.
Do your managers spend more time reviewing the CRM than listening to calls?
Are there open leads without any scheduled activity? Filter for this and count how many come up.
Does it take more than a week for a new rep to work autonomously?
Rule: with 3 or more "yes" answers, the problem is no longer about your plan or setup. It means the work order is decided by each individual and the tool doesn't fix it. With 1 or 2, it can likely be resolved by better configuring what you already have.
What to do: three possible paths
Path | When it makes sense | What it doesn't solve |
|---|---|---|
Better configure Pipedrive (auto-assignment, automations, teams and visibility, calling integration) | 1 or 2 signs from the test, or a team under 15-20 reps | The rep still chooses who to call from a list |
Add an execution layer on top of Pipedrive | 3 or more signs, but the CRM is deeply integrated with the rest of the company | You maintain two tools and must manage synchronization |
Move daily work to an execution tool | 3 or more signs and the CRM is primarily used for sales operations | Requires migration and a few months of change management |
The thresholds in the table reflect Vixiees' internal guidance.
The second option is what Ucademy chose: they kept HubSpot and added the layer that structures daily work on top, without changing CRMs. We detail this in sales execution layer without changing your CRM. Total Renting chose the third.
All three share the same concept: the work order must be set by management and enforced by the system, not left to each rep's memory. At Total Renting, the tool creates a task each time a lead meets a condition (enters as new, sits for 24 hours under review, 48 in evaluation) and sorts them by priority. The top priority is always the client who just called or messaged via WhatsApp or email. The rep simply clicks "next task" and the system opens the correct lead.
How to make the switch without disrupting the team
Total Renting didn't switch overnight. From what they share, we draw four lessons that any large team can apply (the phased breakdown is our own):
Start with a new team. The process was first deployed at Avanti Renting, the group's new brand led by Diego.
Don't roll out to large operations without data. According to them, it took "over a year" to bring it to Total Renting. Lorenzo explains why: "Total Renting's sales volume wasn't even comparable," and they wanted everyone to be "completely aligned."
Convince with real cases, not promises. They ran training sessions showing the same lead managed in Pipedrive versus the new tool. Sales reps were ultimately convinced by their own sales results.
Accept that the first few weeks are tough. Diego admits he considered going back to Pipedrive "a few weeks in," and Lorenzo notes it was "very tough" managing 7 managers across more than 70 reps.
If you want a detailed timeline, in how to implement a sales process change we explain the Pilot-Comparison-Rollout method over eight weeks.
Real case: Total Renting
Total Renting is a vehicle leasing broker that is part of a multi-brand group. They had an established sales process and a CRM, Pipedrive, which Diego and Lorenzo initially did not want to replace.
Aspect | With Pipedrive | With Vixiees |
|---|---|---|
Leads per rep | 50 leads in 4-5 hours | Double that in the same time |
Calls per morning | Around 100 | 200 to 300 |
Sales productivity | Baseline | +30-35% |
Daily workflow | Decided by each rep | "Next task" button driven by leadership priorities |
Forgotten leads | Left without activity | Tool resurfaces them the next day |
Managers' role | Policing duplicates and pipeline updates | Listening to calls and coaching |
New rep onboarding | Learning stages, fields, and CRM navigation | 2-3 days to hit the floor |
Data self-reported by Total Renting in their case study and in the interview recorded by Vixiees, 2026 period. Leads managed and calls per morning are two distinct metrics reported by Lorenzo, not part of the same data series.
One nuance Lorenzo highlights: response time on the first touchpoint barely changed, as they were already fast. What changed, in his words, is that "we call more leads faster." The improvement isn't measured on a single lead; it shows in the aggregate.
And his summary of the shift for managers: "Before, I was a police officer; now I'm an ally to the sales team."
Common mistakes when scaling a team on Pipedrive
Upgrading your plan to fix a process issue. In our experience, adding more automations doesn't change who decides who gets called.
Evaluating reps by assigned deals. This incentivizes hoarding leads rather than working them. Measure completed tasks and leads lacking activity instead.
Hiring more managers to police reps. If the process depends on constant oversight, every new rep requires additional supervision.
Switching tools across the entire team all at once. Test with a small team first and evaluate based on data.
Allowing reps to call outside the system. If calls aren't logged alongside the lead record, managers can neither assist nor verify performance.
Has your team outgrown the way you work in your CRM?
Vixiees organizes your team's daily workload around the priorities you set: each rep clicks "next task" and calls the right lead, with calling and WhatsApp built right into the same screen. You can use it layered over your CRM or as your primary tool, just like Total Renting.
Keep reading: the sales team of a leasing company and daily organization for a sales team.
Opinion of Alex Sánchez, co-founder of Vixiees: when I met Diego, the first thing he told me was that he wanted to stick with Pipedrive. And it made sense: for a team that works well, switching tools is daunting. What made them switch wasn't a new feature, it was seeing a team within their own group handle many more leads without anyone having to chase anyone. With 70 sales reps, the question isn't which CRM you have, but who decides which lead gets called next.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many users can Pipedrive support?
Pipedrive does not publish a maximum number of users. The limits are per company and per plan: leads and deals per seat, automations, teams, and visibility groups, with an absolute cap of 300,000 leads and deals, according to their usage limits page.
Is Pipedrive good for large companies?
It is a good CRM for tracking and managing deals, even with many users. In large phone sales teams like Total Renting, the limit they encountered was in the working method: each sales rep decided the order of their calls, and managers spent a lot of time monitoring.
What Pipedrive plan does a team of more than 50 sales reps need?
Feature-wise, Premium or Ultimate, which include teams, visibility groups, and more automations. Keep in mind the cap of 300,000 leads and deals per company: with 50 seats, that equals about 6,000 per seat. And take the 5-signals test: if 3 or more come up, upgrading your plan probably won't fix it.
Do you have to leave Pipedrive to work with an execution layer?
Not necessarily. You can keep your CRM and add a tool on top to organize each sales rep's tasks, as Ucademy did with HubSpot. Total Renting preferred to move all daily work to Vixiees.
How long does it take to change the way a large team works?
It depends on the volume and how much you want to test beforehand. Total Renting first set it up in a new brand within the group and, according to them, took more than a year to bring it to the main brand. Once the system was in place, a new sales rep was up and running in 2 to 3 days.
Sources
Real success story: Total Renting
Pipedrive: usage limits by plan (updated September 3, 2026)
Pipedrive: plan pricing (accessed October 2026)
Interviews with Lorenzo Bertolini, commercial director, and Diego Juárez, who manages Total Renting's projects, recorded by Vixiees in 2026.


